Compliances
Browse compliance frameworks supported by Prowler Registry. Filter by cloud provider to find relevant standards.
Browse compliance frameworks supported by Prowler Registry. Filter by cloud provider to find relevant standards.
The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) is a cybersecurity control framework for cloud computing, composed of 197 control objectives structured in 17 domains covering all key aspects of cloud technology. The CCM can be used as a tool for the systematic assessment of a cloud implementation, and provides guidance on which security controls should be implemented by which actor within the cloud supply chain.
dora_2022_2554
dora_2022_2554
dora_2022_2554
dora_2022_2554
dora_2022_2554
fedramp_20x_frr_class_c_2026.09.13.02
fedramp_20x_frr_class_c_2026.09.13.02
fedramp_20x_frr_class_c_2026.09.13.02
fedramp_20x_ksi_2026.07.14.01
fedramp_20x_ksi_2026.07.14.01
fedramp_20x_ksi_2026.07.14.01
fedramp_20x_ksi_2026.07.14.01
fedramp_20x_ksi_2026.07.14.01
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 program, codified in 32 CFR Part 170, is the U.S. Department of Defense mechanism to verify that defense contractors protect Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It defines three levels: Level 1 (15 basic safeguarding requirements from 48 CFR 52.204-21), Level 2 (the 110 security requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2) and Level 3 (24 enhanced requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172).
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 program, codified in 32 CFR Part 170, is the U.S. Department of Defense mechanism to verify that defense contractors protect Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It defines three levels: Level 1 (15 basic safeguarding requirements from 48 CFR 52.204-21), Level 2 (the 110 security requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2) and Level 3 (24 enhanced requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172).
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 program, codified in 32 CFR Part 170, is the U.S. Department of Defense mechanism to verify that defense contractors protect Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It defines three levels: Level 1 (15 basic safeguarding requirements from 48 CFR 52.204-21), Level 2 (the 110 security requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2) and Level 3 (24 enhanced requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172).
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 program, codified in 32 CFR Part 170, is the U.S. Department of Defense mechanism to verify that defense contractors protect Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It defines three levels: Level 1 (15 basic safeguarding requirements from 48 CFR 52.204-21), Level 2 (the 110 security requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2) and Level 3 (24 enhanced requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172).
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 program, codified in 32 CFR Part 170, is the U.S. Department of Defense mechanism to verify that defense contractors protect Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It defines three levels: Level 1 (15 basic safeguarding requirements from 48 CFR 52.204-21), Level 2 (the 110 security requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2) and Level 3 (24 enhanced requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172).
The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0 program, codified in 32 CFR Part 170, is the U.S. Department of Defense mechanism to verify that defense contractors protect Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It defines three levels: Level 1 (15 basic safeguarding requirements from 48 CFR 52.204-21), Level 2 (the 110 security requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2) and Level 3 (24 enhanced requirements selected from NIST SP 800-172).
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a European Union regulation (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) that sets a uniform framework for the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector. Mandatory since 17 January 2025, it applies to financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, etc.) and to ICT third-party service providers. DORA is structured around five pillars: ICT risk management, ICT-related incident reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk management, and information sharing. This Prowler mapping covers the technical controls auditable from cloud configuration; the organisational, contractual and supervisory obligations defined in DORA must be addressed outside of Prowler.
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a European Union regulation (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) that sets a uniform framework for the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector. Mandatory since 17 January 2025, it applies to financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, etc.) and to ICT third-party service providers. DORA is structured around five pillars: ICT risk management, ICT-related incident reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk management, and information sharing. This Prowler mapping covers the technical controls auditable from cloud configuration; the organisational, contractual and supervisory obligations defined in DORA must be addressed outside of Prowler.
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a European Union regulation (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) that sets a uniform framework for the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector. Mandatory since 17 January 2025, it applies to financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, etc.) and to ICT third-party service providers. DORA is structured around five pillars: ICT risk management, ICT-related incident reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk management, and information sharing. This Prowler mapping covers the technical controls auditable from cloud configuration; the organisational, contractual and supervisory obligations defined in DORA must be addressed outside of Prowler.
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a European Union regulation (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) that sets a uniform framework for the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector. Mandatory since 17 January 2025, it applies to financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, etc.) and to ICT third-party service providers. DORA is structured around five pillars: ICT risk management, ICT-related incident reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk management, and information sharing. This Prowler mapping covers the technical controls auditable from cloud configuration; the organisational, contractual and supervisory obligations defined in DORA must be addressed outside of Prowler.
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a European Union regulation (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554) that sets a uniform framework for the digital operational resilience of the EU financial sector. Mandatory since 17 January 2025, it applies to financial entities (banks, insurers, investment firms, payment institutions, etc.) and to ICT third-party service providers. DORA is structured around five pillars: ICT risk management, ICT-related incident reporting, digital operational resilience testing, ICT third-party risk management, and information sharing. This Prowler mapping covers the technical controls auditable from cloud configuration; the organisational, contractual and supervisory obligations defined in DORA must be addressed outside of Prowler.
Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) for Okta Identity as a Service (IDaaS), Version 1 Release 2 (Benchmark Date: 05 Jan 2026).
The accreditation scheme of the ENS (National Security Scheme) has been developed by the Ministry of Finance and Public Administrations and the CCN (National Cryptological Center). This includes the basic principles and minimum requirements necessary for the adequate protection of information.
The accreditation scheme of the ENS (National Security Scheme) has been developed by the Ministry of Finance and Public Administrations and the CCN (National Cryptological Center). This includes the basic principles and minimum requirements necessary for the adequate protection of information.
The accreditation scheme of the ENS (National Security Scheme) has been developed by the Ministry of Finance and Public Administrations and the CCN (National Cryptological Center). This includes the basic principles and minimum requirements necessary for the adequate protection of information.
FedRAMP Rules (FRR) that cloud service providers must follow for a FedRAMP 20x Class C Certification, from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.09.13.02, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). Covers the 158 provider rules of the 15 rulesets on the 20x Class C reference page; rules that only bind FedRAMP, agencies, assessors or advisors are excluded, and class-varying rules use their Class C statement. Most rules are program and process obligations that need manual evidence. The Key Security Indicators of the same ruleset are in the fedramp_20x_ksi_2026 framework.
FedRAMP Rules (FRR) that cloud service providers must follow for a FedRAMP 20x Class C Certification, from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.09.13.02, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). Covers the 158 provider rules of the 15 rulesets on the 20x Class C reference page; rules that only bind FedRAMP, agencies, assessors or advisors are excluded, and class-varying rules use their Class C statement. Most rules are program and process obligations that need manual evidence. The Key Security Indicators of the same ruleset are in the fedramp_20x_ksi_2026 framework.
FedRAMP Rules (FRR) that cloud service providers must follow for a FedRAMP 20x Class C Certification, from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.09.13.02, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). Covers the 158 provider rules of the 15 rulesets on the 20x Class C reference page; rules that only bind FedRAMP, agencies, assessors or advisors are excluded, and class-varying rules use their Class C statement. Most rules are program and process obligations that need manual evidence. The Key Security Indicators of the same ruleset are in the fedramp_20x_ksi_2026 framework.
FedRAMP 20x Key Security Indicators (KSIs) from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.07.14.01, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). KSIs are outcome-oriented indicators that cloud service providers must demonstrate through automation and continuous monitoring; they do not replace the FedRAMP Rules (FRR) program obligations. Class A authorizations mandate a subset of seven KSIs via FRC-CLA-MFR; Classes B and C apply the full catalog within the Minimum Assessment Scope, with five indicators optional on Class B and required on Class C.
FedRAMP 20x Key Security Indicators (KSIs) from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.07.14.01, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). KSIs are outcome-oriented indicators that cloud service providers must demonstrate through automation and continuous monitoring; they do not replace the FedRAMP Rules (FRR) program obligations. Class A authorizations mandate a subset of seven KSIs via FRC-CLA-MFR; Classes B and C apply the full catalog within the Minimum Assessment Scope, with five indicators optional on Class B and required on Class C.
FedRAMP 20x Key Security Indicators (KSIs) from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.07.14.01, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). KSIs are outcome-oriented indicators that cloud service providers must demonstrate through automation and continuous monitoring; they do not replace the FedRAMP Rules (FRR) program obligations. Class A authorizations mandate a subset of seven KSIs via FRC-CLA-MFR; Classes B and C apply the full catalog within the Minimum Assessment Scope, with five indicators optional on Class B and required on Class C.
FedRAMP 20x Key Security Indicators (KSIs) from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.07.14.01, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). KSIs are outcome-oriented indicators that cloud service providers must demonstrate through automation and continuous monitoring; they do not replace the FedRAMP Rules (FRR) program obligations. Class A authorizations mandate a subset of seven KSIs via FRC-CLA-MFR; Classes B and C apply the full catalog within the Minimum Assessment Scope, with five indicators optional on Class B and required on Class C.
FedRAMP 20x Key Security Indicators (KSIs) from the FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026 (release 2026.07.14.01, https://github.com/FedRAMP/rules). KSIs are outcome-oriented indicators that cloud service providers must demonstrate through automation and continuous monitoring; they do not replace the FedRAMP Rules (FRR) program obligations. Class A authorizations mandate a subset of seven KSIs via FRC-CLA-MFR; Classes B and C apply the full catalog within the Minimum Assessment Scope, with five indicators optional on Class B and required on Class C.